No-Cost, No-Obligation Essure Lawsuit Review

Information about Essure Claims from Lawyers Handling Essure Lawsuits in

 Essure Attorneys
Essure Lawsuit News

The Essure Birth Control Device Can Cause Permanent Sterility

Early product descriptions of the Essure Birth Control Device stressed how convenient it would be to simply have it removed when the time came you wanted to have children, but not so

Friday, June 8, 2018 - Essure was originally marketed as a temporary form of birth control, one that could be reversed when the appropriate time came. Millions of young women wanting to someday start or add to their family had finally found the perfect family planning tool. Patients were told that Essure could be implanted without surgery in a minimally invasive procedure performed in minutes in the comfort and convenience of the doctor's office. There was no need to take hormone injections. Essure was promised to be more effective at preventing pregnancy and less risky to a patient's health than other birth control methods. Imaging the horror Essure women felt when complications from the device set in, the pain became too great, and the device had to be removed, leaving a woman permanently sterile.

Only when tens of thousands of women complained and many filed suit did the company change their product description to stress in boldface print that Essure is a "permanent" and irreversible form of birth control. Millions of other women using Essure are just now finding this out.

Women using the Essure Birth control device have experienced the device migrating away from the Fallopian tubes where it was intended to stay and traveling up into the uterus. The Essure device is a sharp, metal, spring-like coil that can damage and puncture the reproductive organs, and cause abnormally heavy and longer periods, severe cramping, and constant, searing pain, so intense that many women report being bed-ridden and have no choice other than to attempt to have the device removed. Unfortunately for many, removing the device also included removing the uterus and thus leaving a woman permanently and irreversibly sterile.

If you are one of the women that are suffering as a result of Essure failing to adhere to the Fallopian tubes and migrating to the uterus and other places in the abdominal cavity, consider joining the thousands of women who have hired an Essure attorney, and sue Essure's maker, Bayer Pharmaceuticals of Germany for bringing a faulty medical device to market and failing to warn consumers of the adverse side effects and underestimating the device's failure rate. Essure removal surgery is painful, dangerous, and expensive if you can even find a surgeon willing to undertake the procedure. Lawsuits and adverse event reports have prompted Bayer to admit they underestimated the devices side effects when they changed the product's warning label to include the following:

"Some patients implanted with the Essure System for "Permanent" Birth Control have experienced and/or reported adverse events, including perforation of the uterus and/or fallopian tubes, identification of inserts in the abdominal or pelvic cavity, persistent pain, and suspected allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. If the device needs to be removed to address such an adverse event, a surgical procedure will be required."

More Recent Essure Complications Lawsuit News:

We will represent all persons involved in an Essure lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning our attorneys charge never charge any legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of our Essure lawyers will contact you to answer any of your questions.

No-Cost, No-Obligation Essure Lawsuit Case Review If You or a Loved One Suffered from Essure Problems

Onder Law is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.