No-Cost, No-Obligation Essure Lawsuit Review

Information about Essure Claims from Lawyers Handling Essure Lawsuits in

 Essure Attorneys
Essure Lawsuit News

Update on The Medical Devices Safety Act

When approved, The Act will improve medical device safety as well as give those injured a means of attaining fair monetary compensation

Thursday, June 6, 2019 - Outrage on the part of Essure patients and consumer advocacy groups has prompted the US Congress to revisit passing the Medical Devices Safety Act. The bill would serve two purposes according to Congresswomen Rosa DeLauro (CT-03) and Louise Slaughter (NY-25): "to reform the review process for medical devices and increase access to legal recourse for victims of unsafe devices." These two categories have joined to not only cause harm to millions of medical device patients but also prevents them from taking legal action to be made whole.

The Netflix documentary film "The Bleeding Edge" has shed light on the FDA's failure to adequately test medical devices such as heart defibrillators, breast implants, transvaginal mesh, and birth control devices, before allowing them to go to market. Under the FDA's 510 (k) fast-track approval program, all a medical device manufacturer has to do is to demonstrate that their new invention is substantially similar to one that is already on the market. The problems occur, however, when the medical devices that the new one seeking approval is compared to, has been the subject of lawsuits or recalled. The film also points out the "daisy chain" of the medical device approval process where one device is compared to another, and then another, and then another and no mention is made as to whether or not any of the devices in the chain really work or has been found to malfunction or are defective. Essure birth control lawyers will provide a free case review to women and the family members of women who have been harmed by Essure.

The other problem with existing statutes is that the law is out of date when it comes to preventing plaintiffs from seeking punitive damages against one of these medical devices based on the fact that the FDA approved it. The law was written prior to relaxing medical device approval procedures and has not been updated to reflect the fact that the FDA does not really test medical devices any longer. Plaintiffs should be allowed to seek punitive damages against medical device makers that have not fully tested their products.

Finally, doctors and surgeons are generally unaware that there was little if any testing of the medical device they recommend as they assume that if the device was awarded FDA approval, it must be safe, again a falsehood.

A recent article in Time magazine reviewed the Netflix documentary on medical devices and concluded that most medical devices that make it to the market today do so by escaping the scrutiny of the FDA. They claim that testing methods used by the FDA which starting testing medical devices in 1976 have not changed when the medical devices have changed dramatically since then. Today little if any human testing is done on a medical device and the FDA relies on post-market testing usually performed by the company itself. This method is flawed as it basically asks the company that profits from selling the device to self-police. When Bayer decided to stop selling Essure at the end of 2018, the FDA required the company to conduct a post-market survey of the faulty birth control device. The testing and conclusions were originally due in two years but that deadline has been extended for another three for a total of five years. The number of patients in the survey was also decreased as Bayer claims that their market withdrawal prevented them from reaching the target. If you ask me, Bayer will continue to drag out the post-market survey as long as they possibly can to avoid the inevitable conclusions. Between defective breast implants, the failed transvaginal mesh, and now Essure, little has been done to prevent millions of women from experiencing horrendous, life-threatening side effects of these devices, as was, I assume, in the original FDA charter.

More Recent Essure Complications Lawsuit News:

Essure Lawsuits: No Fees Unless We Collect for You

We will represent all persons involved in an Essure lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning our attorneys charge never charge any legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of our Essure lawyers will contact you to answer any of your questions.

No-Cost, No-Obligation Essure Lawsuit Case Review If You or a Loved One Suffered from Essure Problems

OnderLaw, LLC is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. OnderLaw has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others, and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.